In the four decades since James Cameron introduced the world to a cybernetic assassin sent from a dystopian future, new RealClearPennsylvania/Emerson polling indicates nearly three-quarters of Pennsylvanians have seen “The Terminator.”
Pennsylvanians are keeping a watchful eye on the rise of the machines.
When surveying the landscape of Artificial Intelligence, Pennsylvanians are not necessarily seeing a helping hand. The mood across Pennsylvania suggests a far more skeptical, if not outright fearful, outlook.
The AI skepticism is broad-based. Nearly half of Pennsylvanians, 48%, believe AI will have a negative impact on the economy, nearly double the 25% who anticipate a positive outcome.
This pessimism extends beyond the wallet to the world around us, with 46% believing AI will negatively impact the environment, compared to just 21% who see a green upside.
However, the anxiety becomes most palpable when we drill down into employment.
The traditional narrative of automation has always focused on blue-collar labor, the robot arm replacing the assembly line worker. Yet, the current AI wave is crashing against different shores. In a striking reversal of historical trends, it is the white-collar sector that feels the most exposed.
While 55% of all Pennsylvanians believe AI will decrease the number of jobs in their specific industries, the fear is highest in the gleaming office towers, not the factory floors. A staggering 64% of those working in finance, insurance, and real estate expect job losses, followed closely by 60% of those in professional and business services.
Even the healthcare industry, often touted as “future-proof” due to the human element of care, sees 59% of its workforce anticipating a decrease in jobs.
Conversely, the manufacturing sector, perhaps hardened by decades of previous automation waves or confident in the physical necessity of their trade, is the least pessimistic, though 44% still foresee job cuts.
This is not merely distinct paranoia. It is grounded in real life. Nearly a quarter of Pennsylvanians report knowing someone who has already lost their job due to the implementation of AI.
While 77% have not yet seen this personally, the fact that one in four residents has a degree of separation from AI-induced unemployment changes the conversation from theoretical risk to present danger.
Consequently, the existential dread is real.
When asked to gauge the danger of this technology, only 10% of residents feel it poses “no threat at all.” The vast majority see danger on the horizon: 30% view AI as a “significant threat” to humanity, while another 41% categorize it as a “moderate threat.”
Yet, the Pennsylvania voter is nothing if not pragmatic.
Even amidst this high-tech anxiety, there is an appetite for the nuts-and-bolts economic benefits that the physical infrastructure of the internet provides.
When the topic shifts from “artificial intelligence” to “data centers,” the massive, energy-hungry warehouses that power the algorithms, optimism rebounds. A solid majority of 61% think it is likely that data centers will create a significant number of new jobs in the state, with 17% calling it “very likely.”
There lies the complex irony of the Pennsylvania mindset.
We are wary of the software, but we are more than willing to build the hardware.
As policymakers and business leaders navigate this transition, they must respect this contradiction. They are governing a populace that is bracing for impact, viewing the future through a lens of caution rather than wonder. We are a Commonwealth that prefers concrete to code.
Until the technology proves it is here to enhance humanity rather than replace it, the skepticism will remain.
Ultimately, the Commonwealth waits to see if this technological shift delivers a workforce “Judgment Day” or an infrastructure “payday.”
While we welcome the concrete reality of new data centers, we remain deeply skeptical of the abstract threats posed by the artificial intelligence they house.
Pennsylvanians understand that this transformation is inevitable, not optional. We can only hope that our economic preparation is sufficient for the challenges ahead, because this technology is unlike any industrial cycle we have seen before.
It does not sleep, it does not stop, and much like the cyborg that nearly three-quarters of us recognize, it has delivered its own iconic warning to the status quo: “Come with me if you want to live.”
This article was originally published by RealClearPennsylvania and made available via RealClearWire.
