An analysis of this week’s Supreme Court arguments in a Maryland fight over a school’s decision to teach sexually deviant behaviors to children and not allow parents to opt their kids out of those classes has concluded that Justice Ketanji Jackson is “either the dumbest or most evil member” on the court.
Dumbest might be in ascendance, as this was the same individual who, during her Senate confirmation hearing, was unable to tell inquiring senators what is a “woman.”
A recording of her revealing her agenda was posted online:
Wow.
Like the dog returning to its vomit, so Justice Jackson returns to this idea that “we don’t know that these books aren’t just sitting on the shelves.”
The Montgomery County Public Schools policy couldn’t be clearer—the kids must be taught these books.
When @becketfund… pic.twitter.com/BExNVBpDbG
— Tyler O’Neil (@Tyler2ONeil) April 22, 2025
An analysis at RedState explained that should have been a “red flag.”
On the court, she’s been reliably a “left-wing vote,” it said.
“There is no level of partisanship she won’t stoop to in order to defend a Democrat viewpoint, and that was on display again in recent oral arguments surrounding parental rights,” it said.
“While a majority of the court seemed to be leaning toward affirming that obvious right, Jackson showed she’s either the dumbest or most evil member of the court,” it said.
It pointed out that she wasn’t even “aware” of the fact that the fight is over Montgomery County School District’s actions, which “require” the books to be taught.
She argued that perhaps those books are just “sitting on the shelves,” meaning that a temporary injunction to affirm the parents’ rights would be inappropriate.
The analysis notes that Jackson does come across “as vapid and ill-equipped,” … or “the other option is that she’s just evil, and the rest is an act.”
“Returning to the core issue, why is it this important for public schools to talk about topics that violate the religious principles of some parents?” the analysis noted. “Does LGBTQ ideology really trump religious liberty? It doesn’t, but Jackson thinks it does, and that’s a scary proposition. Imagine a court with a few more justices in her mold, and where that would leave the country.”
It explained, “Justice Brett Kavanaugh brought some sanity to the discussion by pointing out how absurd Jackson’s arguments were.”
Justice Kavanaugh with the most important point of the day:
“They’re not asking you to change what’s taught in the classroom. They’re only seeking to be able to walk-out so their children aren’t exposed to things that are contrary to their own beliefs.”pic.twitter.com/03p4RKl6RT
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) April 22, 2025
This woman should have never been put on the High Court. Teaching kids they can change their gender is not only morally wrong but it’s biologically and scientifically incorrect.
This is indoctrination and has nothing to do with inclusivity or inclusion. pic.twitter.com/cyKpG8vRIc
— Therealrob (@Therealrobx) April 22, 2025
