<![CDATA[Democrat Party]]><![CDATA[Department of War]]><![CDATA[DHS]]><![CDATA[Elissa Slotkin]]><![CDATA[ICE]]><![CDATA[Terrorism]]>Featured

We Now Know How Many Terrorist Attacks It Takes to Get Democrats to Blink on DHS Funding – RedState

I’ll spare you the suspense. It’s four. Four terrorist attacks in the span of 12 days. That’s what it took to get a prominent Democrat to finally blink on her resistance party’s month-long blockade of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding.





Democrats’ repeated rejection of bipartisan bills to reopen the shuttered agency amid heightened threats from Iran-linked extremism shifted dramatically on Friday morning, when Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) publicly declared the need to fund DHS.

Slotkin is suddenly pushing to hold the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) debate separately from the department’s funding.

“Certainly, we need to fund the Department of Homeland Security, and we need, in my view, to cut away all the conversation on ICE, which is its own conversation, from all the core missions of the Department of Homeland Security.”


READ MORE: White House Blasts Dems ‘Reckless’ DHS Shutdown As TSA Lines Get Longer

Watch: Dems Reveal Peak Hypocrisy and Unbelievable Demand As They Continue Blocking DHS Funding


Slotkin voted against that proposition just yesterday. Yesterday!

ICE, as Fox News analyst Guy Benson explains, is fully funded for the next three years. A fact that highlights the fact that Democrats have been playing politics from the get-go when it comes to TSA and DHS.

“For her to say that ‘certainly’ we need to fund Homeland Security—I agree—but I’m not the one who voted to keep it closed yesterday, which is what she did,” Benson said in an appearance on the network this morning.





It only took repeated acts of jihadist-inspired violence to get her to crack. She watched shootings in Austin and at Old Dominion University, and a failed (by the grace of God) IED plot in New York City, and essentially said, ‘You know what, I’m still not convinced.’

But on Thursday, just hours after an ISIS-sympathizing gunman shouting “Allahu Akhbar” killed decorated veteran Lt. Col. Brandon Shah at ODU, Ayman Mohamad Ghazali, a Lebanese national, weaponized his vehicle against a synagogue in Michigan, in what the FBI described as a “targeted act of violence against the Jewish community.”

And that appears to be what has finally broken Slotkin. Or was it?

“There was a vote on this yesterday, which finished, by the way, AFTER the attack in Michigan, in her state. She reacted on social media to that terrorist attack in her state before the vote ended that kept the Democrat filibuster alive, meaning that the DHS department remains closed,” Benson explained. “She made that choice to vote to maintain the shuttering, the temporary closing of our Homeland Security agency.”

“And then she comes on the cameras today and says, ‘Well, certainly we need to fund it,'” he added. “She had the chance to do so yesterday, and she chose not to.”





A motion to proceed to a House-passed bill to reopen DHS failed Thursday when 46 Democrats voted against it. The lone person in favor of funding the department was Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA).

Slotkin isn’t the only prominent voice on the left to seemingly finally grasp the gravity of what they’ve been doing by defunding the very department designed to protect the homeland from terrorist attacks.

Jeh Johnson, the Secretary of Homeland Security under former President Barack Obama, is another rare example of someone who has somewhat come to their senses on the matter.

“I believe we are in a heightened threat environment,” Johnson told Fox News’ Bill Melugin earlier today. “Most likely because of events in the Middle East. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. We can decapitate the leadership there, but that does not decapitate the ability to be a state sponsor of terrorists.”

“It does not decapitate the ability to inspire acts of terrorism, including acts of terrorism here in the homeland. And so, bottom line to all of this, we need to fund, Congress needs to fund, the department that exists to ensure homeland security.”





Something has changed, as Melugin states. But look at what it took to get Democrats to show even basic signs of backing away from their ridiculous political games. 

The Austin shooting on March 1st, which killed three people? Not enough to crack.

The IED attack in NYC, for which one perpetrator said he hoped would kill many more than were murdered in the Boston Marathon bombing? Meh.

The ODU Islamic terrorist, who, if he had not been subdued and stabbed by students, might have continued his killing spree? Hold the line.

The synagogue attack … Maybe—MAYBE—we’ve gone a little too far.

The question now is, will Slotkin and Johnson’s comments be enough to sway Democrats to vote in favor of funding DHS? Or will they continue to enable more attacks with the sole intent of pleasing their low-information voters by pretending they’re taking a stand against ICE? Time will tell.


Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress.

Help RedState continue to report on the Democrats’ radicalism and inform voters as our nation faces a crossroads. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.





Source link